Are The Rich Damned?

by Cliff Burton


Though this controversial question tends to be carefully sidestepped in church meetings, Jesus himself addressed it in the Gospel of Mark: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God (Mark 10:25).” Since it seems impossible for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, this passage leaves us with the impression that the rich cannot enter God’s kingdom, or in other words, that the rich are damned. For Mormons with significant wealth, hearing such a comment from Jesus, whose example we’re supposed to follow, can be pretty hard to take.

Such a Mormon might think: “Is it really wrong for me to be wealthy? Didn’t I work hard all these years to earn the wealth I’ve accumulated? What’s wrong with living in a nice home, taking exotic vacations, driving a fancy car, and enjoying the finer things in life? Is that what Jesus really meant, that the rich are damned?”

The Apostles were similarly shocked when they heard what Jesus had said, so they asked him a question hoping to get some further explanation: “Who then can be saved?” Jesus then replied, “With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible (Mark 10:26-27).” For wealthy Mormons this qualifier comes as a godsend, literally: “Oh, good. It looks like I can be rich and get to heaven. I was worried for a second there that I might have to change my lifestyle. I was worried there might be something wrong with being filthy rich. Looks like I won’t need to sell my mansion on the east bench in Salt Lake City and move to the west side of town, get rid of my Hummer and buy a Hyundai, stay in a Motel 6 for my next vacation instead of the Four Seasons, or give all my money away to a bunch of lazy poor people.”

While the passage telling us that with God all things are possible gives the rich some relief from the anxiety of going to hell, unfortunately the New Testament is a big book, and, as it turns out, has some other comments by Jesus that are pretty scary as well, indicating that its not ok to live in luxury while grinding the faces of the poor.

The story of the rich man and Lazarus from the New Testament is one example (Luke 16:20-31). In it, Jesus describes how an anonymous rich man enjoys all the good things in life, while a beggar named Lazarus waits outside the gate of the rich man’s home, hoping to get some of the “crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table.” Instead of getting food from the rich man, dogs come and lick Lazarus’ sores, after which Lazarus dies, apparently from starvation. Angels then carry his soul to “Abraham’s bosom,” in other words to heaven. The rich man dies soon thereafter, and instead of going to heaven like the poor beggar Lazarus, the rich man “lift[s] up his eyes” in hell, “being in torments.”

Apparently the rich man’s cruelty in refusing to share his wealth with others in need, when he had more than plenty to spare, was enough to land him in a tough spot in the afterlife. The rich man even asks the prophet Abraham to send an angel to the man’s still living relatives, in order to warn them that if they are greedy and don’t help the poor, they’ll also go to hell. Abraham refuses, telling the rich man that Moses and the prophets have been preaching such a message all along, and that if the rich man’s relatives don’t listen to Moses and the prophets, they won’t bother listening to an angel either.

For wealthy Mormons this story is likely pretty disturbing, and may make them again wonder whether they can really be rich and go to heaven after all.

But, the rich Mormon says: “the Bible isn’t an infallible book. There are plenty of mistakes, mistranslations, and transmission errors in the text. Maybe all that talk of the rich going to hell in the Bible was added by some Catholic monk in the Middle-Ages, who corrupted the text of what Jesus really said. Instead of thinking that a rich person like me can’t go to heaven, I’m sure I can find some support for my lifestyle in the other holy books of scripture. In fact, I remember some comforting words from the Book of Mormon (a book of scripture written by prophets in the ancient Americas) where the prophet-king Benjamin says that if you keep the commandments, God will bless you and make you rich: “And behold, all that [God] requires of you is to keep his commandments; and he has promised you that if ye would keep his commandments ye should prosper in the land; and he never doth vary from that which he hath said; therefore, if ye do keep his commandments he doth bless you and prosper you (Mosiah 2:22).” The rich Mormon might be tempted to then draw some conclusions, “You see, I’ve become wealthy because of how righteous I am. If I didn’t deserve the money I’ve got, and didn’t deserve to enjoy it, why would God have bothered to make me rich? Other people are poor because they don’t keep the commandments or are lazy, or both. If someone is poor, that’s his own fault, not mine!”

Though King Benjamin’s words might make a rich Mormon a little more optimistic initially, sadly, the Book of Mormon is also a pretty big book and it doesn’t take long before we come across passages that are pretty scary for the rich, just as we find in the Bible. In this case, we simply need to finish reading the exact same sermon of King Benjamin in which we thought the rich had found some comfort. King Benjamin later teaches that anyone who refuses to help those in need isn’t really on the road to heaven:

“And also, ye yourselves will succor those that stand in need of your succor; ye will administer of your substance unto him that standeth in need; and ye will not suffer that the beggar putteth up his petition to you in vain, and turn him out to perish. Perhaps thou shalt say: The man has brought upon himself his misery; therefore I will stay my hand, and will not give unto him of my food, nor impart unto him of my substance that he may not suffer, for his punishments are just- But I say unto you, O man, whosoever doeth this, the same hath great cause to repent; and except he repenteth of that which he hath done he perisheth forever, and hath no interest in the kingdom of God (Mosiah 4:16-18).”

And if that’s not enough, the Book of Mormon prophet Nephi has a few pretty harsh things to say about the rich as well: “But wo unto the rich who are rich as to the things of the world. For because they are rich they despise the poor and they persecute the meek, and their hearts are upon their treasures; wherefore, their treasure is their god. And behold, their treasure shall perish with them also (2 Nephi 9:30).”

So it seems that when God says he will prosper those who keep the commandments, it looks like he was talking about a people or nation as a whole, rather than individuals. For example, in the book of 4 Nephi, Mormon describes how the entire Nephite people prospered due to their righteousness, having all things common among them, so that there were no rich or poor, rather than just a few “righteous” members of society getting rich while everyone else wallowed in poverty.

Does this mean the rich are really damned? It looks like the answer is mostly yes, the rich will be damned. But since Jesus did say that with God all things are possible, there must be some small chance the rich may join the poor beggar Lazarus in heaven. But how is that? In the Doctrine and Covenants (a book of revelations received by the prophet Joseph Smith), God gives some commentary on the story of the Lazarus and the rich man: “Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wealthy, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment (D&C 104:18).”

Apparently, the rich have a chance of going to heaven only if they “impart their portion to the needy.” In other words, if the rich give their wealth to the needy, or use their wealth to help others rather than to live in luxury, they may get to heaven. So even though it is extremely hard for the rich to go to heaven, it is possible, if they have enough charity to want to use their wealth to bless others, rather than watching others, such as the beggar Lazarus, or children in Africa, die from want, just in order to drive nice cars, or have big houses that will impress the neighbors. The prophet Jacob from the Book of Mormon makes this point explicitly: “Think of your brethren like unto yourselves, and be familiar with all and free with your substance, that they may be rich like unto you. But before ye seek for riches, seek ye for the kingdom of God. And after ye have obtained a hope in Christ ye shall obtain riches, if ye seek them; and ye will seek them for the intent to do good—to clothe the naked, and to feed the hungry, and to liberate the captive, and administer relief to the sick and the afflicted (Jacob 2:17-19).”

Of course, it would be best to begin living the Law of Consecration and create a society in which there is neither rich nor poor. But until that time comes, it is important that we have enough charity to use our excess resources to end as much suffering as we can now. Each of us, whether rich or middle-class or even poor by American standards, is incredibly wealthy compared to those in developing countries, hundreds of millions of whom live on less than a dollar a day. If any of us think we are not that well off and don’t have anything to give, seeing life in the slums of Mumbai, or Mexico City, or Port-aux-Prince would change that real quick. Even though it is the fabulously wealthy that will most strongly be condemned at the last day for their cold-heartedness and greed, there is certainly more that each of us can do now to live more frugally and use the excess resources we have to help others. Otherwise we may find that we will, with the wealthy, lift up our eyes in hell as well.

Back to all Articles...


Poster: Kate
But it is not given that one man should possess that which is above another, wherefore the world lieth in sin. (D&C 49:20)

Great article! Oh, man if you have not read Richard E. Johnson\'s \"Wealth and Poverty\" (June 1994) please, please do. It is such a wonderful & stinging indictment of us all (for as you concluded, nearly all Americans are rich compared to our brothers & sisters in the global south and other impoverished nations).

I also wrote a little article on this very subject...

http://www.ldscooperative.com/node/41

Keep up the good work!
Poster: SUNNofaB.C.Rich
really and what do you do, Cliff?
Poster: Jeremy
Kate, where can I find Richard E. Johnson's talk? What magazine or publication is it
in?
Poster: Kate
It was up on a BYU site, but it appears they have taken it down. If you email me kk7390a at student.american.edu I will email you a copy. Luckily I saved it a while back, because I can't find it on the www now.
Poster: Kate
It was up on a BYU site, but it appears they have taken it down. If you email me kk7390a at student.american.edu I will email you a copy. Luckily I saved it a while back, because I can\'t find it on the www now.
Poster: Felix
It was great reading this article but one thing crossed my mind. Jesus lived in a time where property were owned by "a chosen few", kings, priests and so on and capitalism had not accrued. Capitalism is a whole different society where property is not necessarily inherited or belongs to a set of people. Sure, there's a lot of injustice and the money accumulated is a form of power but still you can become rich from hard work.

I think you moralize over something that even Karl Marx would find as justice, qoute: "What is 'a fair distribution'?

Do not the bourgeois assert that the present-day distribution is 'fair'? And is it not, in fact, the only 'fair' distribution on the basis of the present-day mode of production? Are economic relations regulated by legal conceptions, or do not, on the contrary, legal relations arise out of economic ones? Have not also the socialist sectarians the most varied notions about 'fair' distribution?"
Poster: Felix
It was great reading this article but one thing crossed my mind. Jesus lived in a time where property were owned by \"a chosen few\", kings, priests and so on and capitalism had not accrued. Capitalism is a whole different society where property is not necessarily inherited or belongs to a set of people. Sure, there\'s a lot of injustice and the money accumulated is a form of power but still you can become rich from hard work.

I think you moralize over something that even Karl Marx would find as justice, qoute: \"What is \'a fair distribution\'?

Do not the bourgeois assert that the present-day distribution is \'fair\'? And is it not, in fact, the only \'fair\' distribution on the basis of the present-day mode of production? Are economic relations regulated by legal conceptions, or do not, on the contrary, legal relations arise out of economic ones? Have not also the socialist sectarians the most varied notions about \'fair\' distribution?\"
Poster: Freeman
Genesis 13:2 - "And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold."
Poster: Jason
I think it's worth stating explicitely what appears to be only implicit in this article: it's not the riches themselves that are the problem, but the attitude that often goes with them. (Hence Pauls statement that "the love of money is the root of all evil" [emphasis added].)

The issue is really the same as goes with education, atheltic prowess, or anything else where it becomes easy to see yourself as "better" than others. Wealth, education, and success won't keep you out of Heaven, but they tend to breed pride, and that will.
Poster: Kate
I just put up Wealth and Poverty on my website for all to download.

http://www.kateandneil.com/wp-content/uploa ds/2010/03/Wealth-an d-Poverty.pdf
Poster: Suelo
I have a link to The Mormon Worker in my website4.

So refreshing reading your article, Cliff. I'm a "non-Mormon" who, along with most non-Mormons, used to think the LDS cared for nothing but money & corporations & church image, until I found The Mormon Worker. I was also astonished when I finally read the Book of Mormon, what it said about money, wealth, and communal sharing. I thought, "Is this the same scripture the LDS church calls its keystone??" But I'm just as astonished when I read the Gospels, the supposed foundation of my own "Evangelical Chrisitianity" intoxicated by greed.

I'm trying to comprehend Felix's comment about Capitalism being fair distribution, different than the wealth/poverty of Jesus' time. If you've never looked outside the walls of American suburbia and have been programmed by TV, I can see how you could think this. I've seen too much poverty and environmental destruction in both this country & abroad, all as a result of our "fair" capitalism. And the epidemic mental illness (inward poverty) and obesity in the US I witnessed upon returning to the US from abroad was the most disconcerting of all.

As far as "fair distribution" goes, why not follow the clear model of both our own Bible and Book of Mormon: that we own nothing, that we share all things in common! If that doesn't seem fair to us, then we must re-evaluate whether we are servants of God or of Mammon. Why, for 2000 years, has Christendom been trying to prove we can serve both?

Cliff, leap for joy when you get comments like, "really and what do you do, Cliff?". Searching for faults in the messenger shows the message is bringing conviction! But also it helps you examine yourself to stay humble & become more pure.

Poster: Bob
Money is a tool! Think of it like a hammer. If you use a hammer to break the walls of a home then it will bring destruction or you can use the same hammer to build your-self or some else a home which could shelter the homeless. Tools like money are not good or bad, the value depends on association to the individual who utilizes it.

In the reference to Mark 10:25.

John A. Tvedtnes, specialist in ancient Near Eastern studies and instructor at the Brigham Young University–Salt Lake Center. Over the years, biblical commentators have taken three approaches in exploring the meaning of this scripture. The first of these has found wide acceptance among Christians because of the beauty of its teachings. It holds that in ancient times there was a small gate cut inside the larger gate of the city through which one might enter after nightfall, when the city was closed. Although this small gate—termed the “eye of the needle”—could readily admit a man, a camel could enter only by first being relieved of its burden and then by walking through on its knees. The imagery here is that of the sinner casting away his faults (or the rich man his worldly possessions) and kneeling in prayer.

A humble individual will use money for good and not evil. Thus it matters not the quantity. What value do you place on Heavenly Fathers estate, is he rich? People create money and they associate the value to it, not the other way around.
Poster: Adam
Yes Money is a tool and the moral question is what do we do with it? I do not think that Cliff is suggesting the money is evil, but rather the hoarding of it for one’s own gain is being questioned.
As for the "eye of the needle being a small gate," that has been established that it is just not true. There was no such gate.
I think the parable of the widow's mite is telling. The focus is not on how much the widow gave or about making a tithe, but rather how much she had left after she gave. This is the heart of the question, how much we have left after we give? There are many rich people who give millions away, but in light of the widow's mite, how much do they still have left? To me this is a harder and challenging question to ask ourselves.

Bob- "What value do you place on Heavenly Fathers estate, is he rich? People create money and they associate the value to it, not the other way around."
Yes our Father is Rich, but remember he gives away everything that he has to us. It is Ok to be rich and have excess as long as everyone else is rich and has excess. So I am not sure if this analogy works well with our moral probation. Furthermore you are right, we do create value and money, but how many people in the world can devalue money to mean nothing and still live in the world comfortably? Perhaps this is the poor’s problem, they just need to devalue money and they will be OK.

“The idler shall not eat the bread of the laborer has always meant that the idle rich shall not eat the bread of the laboring poor, as they always have.”
– Hugh Nibley
Poster: Chasen
Cliff,

I loved reading your article! I too along with Suelo am a "non-Mormon"... but I have
been raised on a moral Christian upbringing. Haven't recently just left Utah, and
begun studying the Book of Mormon, I can also question what it is we truly put
ourselves behind today whether it be LDS or a direct "Christian" denomination.
Being stuck in the middle-class rat race, and now a hopeful entrepreneur, I can
confess that becoming obsessed with success can be just as dangerous as
obsessing over money, which ultimately pulls my mind away from the truth.

Your website has reignited my fervor for my own internalized faith, and helping
others that may be in need.

Thank you.
Poster: Chasen
Cliff,

I loved reading your article! I too along with Suelo am a "non-Mormon"... but I have
been raised on a moral Christian upbringing. Haven't recently just left Utah, and
begun studying the Book of Mormon, I can also question what it is we truly put
ourselves behind today whether it be LDS or a direct "Christian" denomination.
Being stuck in the middle-class rat race, and now a hopeful entrepreneur, I can
confess that becoming obsessed with success can be just as dangerous as
obsessing over money, which ultimately pulls my mind away from the truth.

Your website has reignited my fervor for my own internalized faith, and helping
others that may be in need.

Thank you.
Poster: David
Thank you for this article. As Brigham Young said, "The worst fear I have about this people is that they will get rich in this country, forget God and His people, wax fat, and kick themselves out of the Church and go to hell. This people will stand mobbing, robbing, poverty, and all manner of persecution and be true. But my greatest fear is that they cannot stand wealth." (quoted in Kimball, Miracle of Forgiveness, 48).
Poster: Joshua
Sounds like it was written by a kid with materially successful parents who doesn't like the idea that now he has to work for a living as no one is going to pay him for his "brilliant" thinking...

Leave Comments:
Your Name:
Comments:
  



Type what you see in the image:
Just copy what you see in here into that text field!